Who is the Middle Class?
Have you been wondering about the lack of serious coverage by the media of the financial crisis facing the middle class? As David Sirota shows us, the media doesn’t seem to understand who the middle class are:
Last year, the New York Times told us it’s difficult for people to make ends meet on $500,000 a year, and the Washington Post insisted that it’s hard to “squeak by” on $300,000 a year. Now the Denver Post insists that if you make $250,000 a year, you may only be “middle class”
Where does utter disconnect with reality come from? And why does it exist?
Media voices perpetuate these myths of the impoverished wealthy, in part, because many media voices are themselves wealthy — and there’s no more powerful class solidarity than that which exists among the rich.
Indeed, the wealthy don’t just convince themselves they aren’t wealthy, they try to create the perception among themselves, politicians and the public at large that they are “middle class” and thus persecuted by taxes. Put another way, the real danger of the New York Times, Washington Post and Denver Post article floating the idea of the wealthy as not wealthy is in skewing our political debate over economics. If someone making $500,000 is just “getting by,” and someone making $300,000 is barely “squeaking by” and someone making $250,000 is in the persecuted “middle class,” then having any fact-based discussion about tax inequities becomes that much harder.
The Wall St. Journal sings a slightly different tune:
For those wondering why luxury spending is back even as unemployment hovers close to 10%, consider this: unemployment among the affluent is only 3%.
According to a study from Northeastern University’s Center for Labor Studies, unemployment for those in the top income decile–individuals earning more than $150,000 a year–was 3% in the fourth quarter of 2009.
According to the WSJ, those in the top income bracket are earning $150,000+ a year, which flies in the face of the assertions that $250,00 is middle class.
The income gap in the US has been increasing since the 1970′s when wages began to stagnate.
So, either the media is engaging in some misdirection in order to help the wealthy keep from paying their fair share of taxes, OR, the definition of the middle class is changing dramatically, and a whole lot of folks are finding out that they are the new poor.
Tags: income inequality

If it is hard to get by on $500,000 a year, then I should qualify for Medicade, which I do not, even though I am expected to get by on unemployment. It seems to me that these new “middle class” figures do more to promote the need for taxes for the “poor” rather than generate sympathy for the over-burdened $250,000 a year + portion of the middle class.
You must sign in or register to post a comment. Registration is free.
I do believe that middle class qualifications these days would be over $250,000; which also means MOST working people today are NOT middle class, though they imagine themselves to be. Think of what 1950s middle class blue-collar workers earned, saved, and bought (they were the TRUE middle class). Most supported families on ONE income. Compare that today…one family head, working full-time to equal that standard of the 50s would most definitely HAVE to earn over $250g. Truth is there is a very SMALL (lower) middle class today. Upper middle class (doctors, lawyers, etc) are still alive and thriving.
You must sign in or register to post a comment. Registration is free.
This blog is going to be impressive resource. Thanks a lot for a collection of good tips. I look forward to reading more in the future. Keep up the excellent work!
Small Business Loans
You must sign in or register to post a comment. Registration is free.